This is an excerpt from the very last part of the screenplay for Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969):
CUT TO
BUTCH streaking, diving again, then up, and the bullets landing around him aren’t even close as—
CUT TO
SUNDANCE, whirling and spinning, continuing to fire and—
CUT TO
SEVERAL POLICEMEN dropping for safety behind the wall and
CUT TO
BUTCH really moving now, dodging, diving, up again and
CUT TO
SUNDANCE flinging away one gun, grabbing another from his holster, continuing to turn and fire and
CUT TO
TWO POLICEMEN falling wounded to the ground and
CUT TO
BUTCH letting out a notch, then launching into another dive forward and
CUT TO
SUNDANCE whirling, but you never know which way he’s going to spin and
CUT TO
THE HEAD POLICEMAN cursing, forced to drop for safety behind the wall and
CUT TO
BUTCH racing to the mules, and then he is there, grabbing at the near mule for ammunition and
CUT TO
SUNDANCE throwing the second gun away, reaching into his holster for another, continuing to spin and fire and
CUT TO
BUTCH and he has the ammunition now and
CUT TO
ANOTHER POLICEMAN screaming as he falls and
CUT TO
BUTCH, his arms loaded, tearing away from the mules and they’re still not even coming close to him as they fire and the mules are behind him now as he runs and cuts and cuts again, going full out and—
CUT TO
THE HEAD POLICEMAN cursing incoherently at what is happening and—
CUT TO
SUNDANCE whirling faster than ever and
CUT TO
BUTCH dodging and cutting and as a pattern of bullets rips into his body he somersaults and lies there, pouring blood and
CUT TO
SUNDANCE running toward him and
CUT TO
ALL THE POLICEMEN rising up behind the wall now, firing and
CUT TO
SUNDANCE as he falls.
The script’s writer, William Goldman, mentions this specific scene in his book “Adventures in the Screen Trade” to make a point about action-writing. Read the sequence again and see if you notice something unusual about it.
UPDATE: In comments, Neil noted:
“and and and and and and and”I really really hate the way that’s written. I’m perfectly happy with something like:
SUNDANCE flings away one gun, grabs another from his holster, continuing to turn and fire as –
TWO POLICEMEN fall wounded to the ground.
BUTCH lets out a notch. He launches into another dive forward.
SUNDANCE whirls around, but you never know which way he’s going to spin.
THE HEAD POLICEMAN curses. He drops to safety behind the wall.
And a second comment:
IMO there’s no need for CUT TO at all. Obviously it’s going to be a cut – it’s an action scene.
Although that wasn’t the point I was looking to make by posting the scene, let me say that I agree. Goldman has always used CUT TO (left-justified) to signify cutting from one camera shot to another. Since he’s William Goldman, he can pretty much do whatever the hell he wants. Per current style guides and the trend away from directing and ‘scripty’ lingo, it’s preferable to approach the scene description like Neil did. Or if you prefer, use secondary slugs:
BUTCHstreaking, diving again, then up, and the bullets landing around him aren’t even close as –
SUNDANCEwhirling and spinning, continuing to fire –
SEVERAL POLICEMEN
dropping for safety behind the wall –
Either way — how Neil wrote it or with secondary slugs — infers a CUT TO between camera shots. In other words, it’s a way of ‘directing’ the action without using directing lingo.
Re Tom’s comment: The highlighted scene is not the last scene in the movie, but the one where Butch hauls ass through the courtyard to get ammo while Sundance provides cover. That’s how they get shot up, setting up that last scene where they talk about Australia and so on. The actual last scene in Goldman’s script does have the freeze-frame:
CLOSEUP – BUTCH AND SUNDANCETHE CAMERA FREEZES THEM. And as it does, a tremendous fusilage of shots is heard, then another, even louder, and more and more shots, building its tempo and sound. The shots continue to sound. Butch and Sundance remain frozen.
FINAL FADE OUT
THE END
So in fact, the movie did carry through Goldman’s vision in that ending scene.
It’s interesting how screenplay style has changed so much since Goldman wrote Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (which was a spec script — essentially the first of its kind — and sold for over a quarter million dollars) in 1967-1968. CLOSEUP and even THE CAMERA FREEZES THEM would probably be considered clunky today.
While the scene sparked an interesting discussion about style, the point I was trying to make is this: The entire highlighted scene is one sentence. That’s 293 words before Goldman ends the ‘sentence’ with a period after “he falls”.
Goldman notes why he chose to write it that way: He wanted the reader to understand that this moment is one continuous chain of action, no breaks, no interruptions. In a way, it’s the storm before the calm – the following scene with Butch and Sundance, their final conversation:


"and and and and and and and"
I really really hate the way that's written. I'm perfectly happy with something like:
SUNDANCE flings away one gun, grabs another from his holster, continuing to turn and fire as –
TWO POLICEMEN fall wounded to the ground.
BUTCH lets out a notch. He launches into another dive forward.
SUNDANCE whirls around, but you never know which way he’s going to spin.
THE HEAD POLICEMAN curses. He drops to safety behind the wall.
IMO there's no need for CUT TO at all. Obviously it's going to be a cut – it's an action scene.
I get the sense that everything is happening all at once in the original and not in what Ive done, but again – obvious?
Maybe I'm completely wrong here, but….
I agree with both of Neil's comments.
I also noticed that although every action is a mini-scene in itself the overall scene is actually three separate main scenes –
What Butch is doing and
What Sundance is doing and
What the policemen are doing
(and I threw in all the ands to keep with the style).
Lastly, if I’m correct, that’s not the way the last scene actually played out. Although Butch and Sundance were both wounded, they made it back into the room where they were taking shelter. Then they burst out into the open, the scene froze and went to sepia. William Goldman’s vision never made it to the screen.
I'll respond in an update to the original post.
Everyone should "hate" how it's written unless that's their voice. But don't confuse "hate" with seeing it differently.
One of the drafts of one of the BOURNE scripts does the CUT TO slugline thing. I was wondering where the heck it came from.
In my head it captured the pacing of the movie better than it would have been with no CUT TO's, although regular mini-slugs might have done the same.