Open Forum question from Adrian:
Just a question regarding the process of writing and I’m curious how other writers go ahead with this, but how do you find the perfect marriage between the physical journey and the emotional journey?Does the concept and physical conflict take hold first or does the emotional journey pave the way for the physical conflict?
I’m sure you’ll get some interesting and diverse responses from GITS readers. As for me, let me first steer you here where you can download (for free, of course) one of my online screenwriting lectures in which I lay out a screenplay paradigm – what I call Narrative Throughline – that presents what is traditionally covered in most paradigms — the plot (what I call Plotline), but also takes into account the underlying psychological realm of the story, what I call Themeline.
The Plotline is comprised of events, both minor and major, that occur largely as a result of the actions and dialogue of characters. Since a movie viewer can see and hear these narrative elements, we can call this is the External World
The Themeline reflects the intentions (tied to actions) and subtext (tied to dialogue) of characters, and is that part of the story world where emotional, psychological, and even spiritual change happens within various characters. Since that process is largely ‘inside’ characters, we can call this the Internal World.
So per your question, the “physical journey” is represented in my language system as the Plotline (External World). And the “emotional journey” is represented as the Themeline (Internal World).
If you look at Narrative Throughline, you’ll see that my Plotline looks very much like a traditional screenplay structure: 3 acts, 10 major plots, or if you prefer the sequence approach, you’ve got 8 sequences (the pages between the major plot points) with an Opening and a Denouement as bookends.
But it’s in this other realm — the Themeline — that you see something that is often missing in other paradigms. Four movements:
That reflects the basic trajectory of what is often called the Protagonist transformation arc. Transformation is the single most common narrative archetype in all of literature – and that’s not me talking, that’s per Joseph Campbell, author of the seminal work “The Hero with a Thousand Faces”. Transformation is at the core of the one story that Campbell saw reflected in most of the world’s myths: The Hero’s Journey.
For purposes of screenwriting, this is important because most mainstream commercial Hollywood movies have a Protagonist who goes through a process of personal transformation. And that four part movement I’ve noted above — from Disunity to Unity — is reflected over and over and over again as constituting the arc of the Protagonist’s transformation.
Circling back to your question, while acknowledging that every story is different, every writer is different, and that there is no one right way to write, I would encourage you to focus on character first, specifically what is going on in their Internal World. Start with the Protagonist and ask some key questions:
* What do they want (External World goal)?
* What do they need (Internal World goal)?
* Who is keeping them from their goal (Nemesis)?
You can ask other questions to sort through other characters to find out which of them is most connected to the Protagonist’s emotional growth (Attractor), intellectual growth (Mentor), and who tests them (Trickster), but if you really zero in on what they want and what they need, you tap right into the heart of both the Plotline and the Themeline: Want will usually dictate what the Final Struggle is at the end of Act Three, and Need will help you to understand what ‘winning’ that struggle actually means to the Protagonist.
In theory, by delving into the characters, particularly the Protagonist, you can unearth what you require to inform both the shaping of the Plotline and the Themeline.
Of course, at the end of the day, we want our screenplay to tell a story that unfolds organically and as unified tale. If well-written, there will be a sort of ‘dance’ that unifies the Plotline and the Themeline: The events that happen in the External World impact characters in their Internal World, causing them to change; and in turn that change causes the character to make different choices through their actions and dialogue in the External World. And so on and so on, one continuous interweaving of cause-and-effect.
So I’ve anted up, casting my lot with character first. But as noted, everyone approaches the story-crafting process differently – and I welcome all GITS readers to weigh in with how they work at blending their story’s physical and emotional journeys.


I think this is the one area of writing with which acting helped me the most- externalizing desire. I just picture my characters in their world, one at a time, and think ok- I want this. What do I do to get it? How do I start?
And then I figure out how to make it hard for them- how to prevent them from getting whatever it is that they want. How to make them try something else, until they've run out of options.
Only then do I consider letting 'em have whatever it is they want.
Hi Scott! Quick question if you have time:
How do you conceptualize the plotline in a story where the character's 'want' is different at the end than it is at the beginning? THE GRADUATE could possibly be seen as an example of this, in that his desire for Elaine doesn't manifest until (if I remember correctly), after the midpoint.
P.S. Apologies if that's slightly off-topic.
@Matt: Re The Graduate, I think the 'want' and 'need' paradigm works. At first, Benjamin didn't know what he wanted – that is an apt description of his problem. He sought out sex with Mrs. Robinson as something to do, and likely fueled by a subconscious desire to rebel against the wishes of his parents and the moral values of their social class.
Then he meets Elaine. And over time, she became the object of his need. That he idealized her as a person who would be the key to his existence – i.e., give him meaning – by being in a loving relationship with her is, of course, wrongheaded. I have no doubt that the couple would split up within a few years of them taking off in the back of that bus together, and I think you see that reflected in the "what the hell have I done" look on both their faces as the movie ends.
But in terms of his transformation, Benjamin starts out not knowing what he wants, reflected in his inertia, then locks onto Elaine as the object of his need.
Thanks Scott! I must admit to being a bit sappier about the ending. But what you're saying makes sense to me. Much appreciated.
Also, I want to thank you for your Narrative Throughline lecture, which I downloaded several months back and was an invaluable lifeline with a concept I was trying to beat out at the time. Again, many thanks.
Hey Thanks Scott! I like what you said about how the story should be a dance of the plotline and the themeline.
That was the major problem I encountered while conceptualizing my story; the internal journey felt very disconnected from the physical one. I guess I just have to dive into the characters more.
And thanks for the link to the throughline lecture, I think it's going to be a major help. Cheers!