Blog

THE SCREENWRITING BLOG OF THE BLACK LIST

Guest Post: Richard Walter

I recently finished “Essentials of Screenwriting”, the newest book from Richard Walter, longtime screenwriter, screenwriting teacher, and chairman of UCLA’s graduate screenwriting program. The book is a worthy addition to the ongoing literary conversation about the craft. So when the opportunity arose for Richard to do a guest post, I jumped at it. I asked Richard to speak to the importance of character in relation to story. Here is what Richard forwarded to me:

Doesn’t it seem as if a new screenwriting book is published every twenty minutes?

I bear no small portion of the blame, as my third such tome burdens bookstore shelves this year. What’s left for me now to write except a book about writing screenwriting books?

My longtime pal, beautiful Viki King, author of the timeless How to Write a Screenplay in 21 Days (I asked her, ‘Why should it take so long?’) told me that the writers of such books do not actually compete with one another. Writers don’t buy one or the other but several such books.

In that regard screenwriting books are no different from cook books.

Perhaps all we story gurus are really doing is contributing to writers block. Writers, instead of writing their screenplays, read our books about writing screenplays.

The vast majority of these books, from Field to Ackerman, to Hunter, to McKee and beyond agree with Scott Myers’ blog and its notion that the single most fundamental aspect of a screenplay is its story. Indeed, the oldest theoretical work treating dramatic narratives, Aristotle’s Poetics, asserts unmistakably that character is important too, of course, but first of all comes story.

Another friend, Andy Norton, has written a splendid book called Writing the Character-Centered Screenplay. With all due respect to Andy, I refer to the character-centered screenplay as simply The Good Screenplay. Don’t all great dramatic narratives treat worthy characters inhabiting skillfully crafted stories? Even the very titles of so many theater and film classics are merely the name of the protagonist: Oedipus Rex, Medea, Julius Caesar, Macbeth, The Godfather, Patton, Bonnie and Clyde.

The mistake made by too many writers and pundits alike, it seems to me, is to treat character and story as if they were separate enterprises.

What is a character, after all, other than the sum total of actions she takes and the dialogue she speaks within the context of the story? As I’ve observed elsewhere, surely the richest, most examined character in all of English language dramatic literature has to be Hamlet. Do you remember how the playwright describes him in the dramatis personae at the front of the play? Three words: Prince of Denmark.

There’s no mention of ‘melancholy.’

So where does this guy Hamlet come from? Clearly, he emerges from the actions that he takes and the lines that he speaks; in other words, the story.

I have been at writing conferences where colleagues suggest writing exercises in which writers create character biographies prior to starting their script. They’re encouraged to ‘really get to know their characters.’ What kind of a candy bar would she eat? What kind of tree would he be? Which among the Seven Wonders of the World would she be?

When I hear such commentary I politely nod in what might be taken for agreement.

I believe, however, quite to the contrary that creating character bios is not for real writers but for dilettantes. I believe that to do so is actually counterproductive. To create characters this way is to suggest that they have life and meaning outside the context of the story.

Rather than knowing your characters well before getting started, I believe that writers are well served by not creating their characters so much as discovering them, that is, dis-covering them, removing the cover that conceals characters who are, in a sense, already there. Surrender any preconceived notions as to your characters’ natures and stay open to the surprises as they emerge from the narrative. If they fail to surprise the writer himself, how will they surprise any audience?

A brilliant and underappreciated screenwriting book by the late Millard Kaufman is Plots and Characters. Note the word in the title that comes first. Kaufman preaches one of the most profound principles I have ever heard regarding not only dramatic but also life narratives: it is not character that defines action but the other way around.

This is why writers are, as I see it, best advised to give up earlier notions regarding their characters and allow them to take shape as the story moves forward. For, after all is said and done, character is story and story is character.

The other day in response to this reader’s question, I quoted Richard’s new book. Here’s part of that excerpt:

Decades spent writing and teaching have taught me that writers’ own personal stories are the only story they should write.

Even if a writer attempts vigorously to do otherwise, even if he works on an assignment writing a script for hire based on someone else’s idea, even an idea totally alien to his experience, he will nonetheless end up telling nothing other than his own personal tale. Whatever the original concept, however specific, however narrow, in all instances it is filtered through the peculiar sensibilities of the specific writer. In the end, despite himself, the writer will create a tale that is personal.

Why fight it?

My advice: Surrender.

It is one battle in which defeat actually amounts to victory.

Self-revelation lies, after all, at the center of not screenwriting alone but all creative expression. How can self-protection — that is, avoiding what is personal — serve any purpose other than to suppress, stifle, and suffocate the emotion that resides at the center of all worthy art?

In such a cynical world with Hollywood as its presumed cultural epicenter, it’s refreshing to find a voice there promoting personal stories.

For more on Richard and his newest book, you can go here to his website.

About the Author: Richard Walter

Richard Walter is a celebrated storytelling guru, movie industry expert, and longtime chairman of UCLA’s legendary graduate program in screenwriting. A screenwriter and published novelist, his latest book, Essentials of Screenwriting, is available in stores July 2010. Professor Walter lectures throughout North America and the world and serves as a court authorized expert in intellectual property litigation. For more information and to order the new Essentials of Screenwriting, visit www.richardwalter.com.

One thought on “Guest Post: Richard Walter

  1. Thanks for this post. I agree that those who argue the supremacy of character over story (or vice-versa) are missing the big picture. Here it is put another way: "What is character but the determination of incident? What is incident but the illustration of character?" —Pär Lagerkvist

Leave a Reply

Connect with: